Rodriguez

(PC) Howard v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20241:24-cv-00285California936 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS No. 1:24-cv-00285-JLT-SAB (PC)

HOWARD,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Plaintiff, TO HALT DISCLOSURE AND OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO v. EXTENSION OF TIME 14 RODRIGUEZ, (ECF No. 38) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s failure to protect and negligence claims against Defendant officer Rodriguez. On October 28, 2024, the Court granted Defendant’s request for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading. (ECF No. 35.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “motion halting disclosure” and opposition to Defendant’s previous request for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading. (ECF Nos. 38, 39, 40.) /// /// 28 I. DISCUSSION …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.