Brazil

(PC) Bazzo v. Brazil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20241:24-cv-00768California641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FRANK MONACO BAZZO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00768-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER CONSTRUING REQUEST FOR

JUDICIAL NOTICE AS MOTION FOR

v. RELIEF FROM FILING FEE (ECF No. 10) BRAZIL, et al.,

DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

Defendants. FILING FEE (ECF No. 10)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RE-SERVE JULY 18, 2024 ORDER ON

PLAINTIFF

14 Plaintiff Frank Monaco Bazzo (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted on July 18, 2024. (ECF Nos. 8, 9.) On November 14, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Request for Judicial Notice Strike Fee.” (ECF No. 10.) In the filing, Plaintiff states that the trust office statement reflects a $350 fee from this Court, even though Plaintiff is indigent and cannot pay the fee. Plaintiff requests that the Court strike the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.