(PC)Azevedo
(PC)Azevedo v. United States Eastern District Courts of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEX LEONARD AZEVEDO, No. 1:24-cv-01404-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
v. TO THIS ACTION UNITED STATES EASTERN DISTRICT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
COURT OF CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE Defendant. DENIED 16 (ECF No. 2) 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on May 9, 2024, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) For the reasons explained below, Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied because he has had at least three actions or appeals dismissed as strikes and the allegations do not demonstrate that Plaintiff meets the imminent danger exception. I. DISCUSSION The Prison Litigation…