CA Coastkeeper Alliance v. Cosumnes Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER No. 2:20-cv-1703 SCR
ALLIANCE,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. COSUMNES CORPORATION dba
MURIETA EQUESTRIAN CENTER,
16 Defendant. 18 Each of the parties in this case has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter was reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes. ECF No. 17. Now before the Court are three motions: 1) Plaintiff’s Motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 113); 2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 115); and 3) Plaintiff’s Motion to exclude expert testimony (ECF No. 118). The Court grants the motion for leave to amend, grants the motion for summary judgment, and denies without prejudice the motion to exclude expert testimony. I. Background and Procedural History Plaintiff California Coastkeeper Alliance filed this action on August 25, 2020. Plaintiff 28 sought civil penalties and injunctive…