(PS) Rile v. Land Home Financial Services Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES EDWARD ELOY RILE, No. 2:24-cv-0184 DAD SCR PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LAND HOME FINANICAL SERVICES, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff James Edward Eloy Rile is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The operative pleading is a third amended complaint (“TAC”). (ECF No. 46.) Pending before the undersigned are various Defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) (ECF Nos. 47, 51, 52, 53, 61, 68) as well as various Defendants’ motions to strike (ECF Nos. 57 & 68). The motions were submitted without oral argument. (ECF No. 70.) While Plaintiff’s pleadings are difficult to follow, this case appears to concern primarily the foreclosure upon and seizure of a truck that Plaintiff had financed in 2021. The previously 28 …