(PC) Petillo v. Lynch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENNIS PETILLO, JR., Case No. 2:24-cv-0421-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this action against various supervisory defendants at California State Prison – Sacramento. ECF No. 11 at 2. His amended complaint is incomprehensible and, thus, fails to state a cognizable claim against any defendant. Additionally, although plaintiff was previously granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 7, it appears he is a three striker within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. He must 23 1 Plaintiff has filed two separate amended complaints. ECF Nos. 10 & 11. This screening order considers only the latter complaint. I have reviewed both filings, however, and the fundamental deficiencies discussed in this screening order exist in both complaints.

2 Plaintiff has had at least three cases dismissed for failure to state a claim: (1)…