Hicks
(PC) Madden v. Hicks
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MADDEN, Successor-in- Case No. 1:18-cv-00255-KES-BAM (PC) Interest to Ryan P. Madden, et al., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM DEFENDANTS v. (ECF No. 80) 14 HICKS, et al., ORDER RESETTING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO Defendants. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
17 I. Introduction Plaintiffs Michael Madden and Kathleen “Kathy” Madden (“Plaintiffs”), as Successors-in- Interest to Ryan P. Madden, are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Hicks for excessive force and assault and battery claims, and against Defendants Silva and Hicks (“Defendants”) for California Bane Act and retaliation claims. On December 4, 2023, Defendants filed a motion for summary…