D.M.
D.M. v. County of Merced
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20241:20-cv-00409California187 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9| D.M., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00409-JLT-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
V. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
Defendants. (ECF No. 180) 14 On November 18, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice. 16 (ECF No. 180.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. 17 Civ. P. 41(a).)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 18 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close the file in this case and 20 adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FA.
93 Dated: _November 19, 2024 ;