Dailey-Henry

Dailey-Henry v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20241:24-cv-00347California1,409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 ALVERA DAILEY-HENRY, Case No. 1:24-cv-00347-KES-SKO 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY FOR v. PLAINTIFF 7 LAND O’LAKES, et al., (Doc. 11) 8 Defendants.

10 I. INTRODUCTION 12 On October 29, 2024, Jay S. Rothman & Associates, attorneys for Plaintiff Alvera Dailey- 13 Henry, filed a motion to withdraw as Plaintiff’s attorney, with a supporting declaration from Jeff D. 14 Neiderman, Esq. (“Attorney Neiderman”). (Doc. 11.) By minute order entered October 30, 2024, 15 the Court directed the parties to file their responses to the motion and reply briefs in accordance 16 with E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230. (Doc. 12.) Neither Plaintiff nor Defendant Land O’Lakes (“Land 17 O’Lakes”) have responded (see Docket). The matter is therefore deemed unopposed and submitted 18 on the papers, pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and the hearing set for December 11, 2024, shall be 19 vacated. 20 Upon consideration of the motion and supporting papers, and for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.