BMO Bank N.A. v. Chahal Roadlines Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20241:24-cv-00788California5,598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-00788-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT1 CHAHAL ROADLINES INC, et. al., (Doc. No. 11) Defendants. 14 DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1) on October 9, 2024. (Doc. No. 11, “Motion”). Plaintiff submits declarations with exhibits in support of its Motion. (Doc. Nos. 12, 12-1 through 12-13, 13). Defendants have not answered or responded to the Complaint, nor have Defendants filed any opposition or taken any action in this case. Having considered the moving papers, declarations, attached exhibits, and applicable law, the undersigned recommends that the district court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. ////

1 This Motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.