Doerer
(PC) Papazian v. Doerer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES MICHAEL PAPAZIAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-01182-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
v. (Doc. No. 5) J. DOERER,
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT
Defendant. OF INMATE FILING FEE BY THE
BUREAU OF PRISONS
16 17 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, initiated this action on September 18, 2024, by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics1. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Prior to screening, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 4, “FAC”). Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis on his FAC and submitted a certification from prison officials in support. (Doc. No. 5). Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915(a) to proceed in forma pauperis but remains obligated to pay the full $350.00 statutory filing fees as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Pursuant to § 1915(b)(1)(A), Plaintiff is obligated to make an initial…