Aramark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVIS JUSTIN CUELLAR, No. 1:24-cv-01196-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION AS MOOT

v. (ECF No. 11) ARAMARK, et al.,

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s November 7, 2024, order denying Plaintiff’s motion for a court order directing the Madera County Jail to submit his application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff contends that because the Madera County Jail is a named Defendant in this action, the Court has jurisdiction over it. Pursuant to Rule 60(b), the Court may relieve a party from a final judgement or order “for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence ...; (3) fraud ..., misrepresentation, or misconduct by an…