Ramadan
(PC) Penate v. Ramadan
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20241:24-cv-01315California941 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT MAURICIO PENATE, No. 1:24-cv-01315-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
v.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
AMR H. RAMADAN, RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
TO THIS ACTION
Defendant.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES (ECF No. 9) 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
18 Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on October 28, 2024. (ECF No. 1) Plaintiff 19 acknowledges on the face of his complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies. 20 (ECF. No. 1 at 3-4). Indeed, Plaintiff admits he has appealed “to highest but I’m awaiting 21 response and need immediate relief from the Court.” (Id.) Therefore, on October 31, 2024, the 22 Court ordered Plaintiff to…