Ramadan

(PC) Penate v. Ramadan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20241:24-cv-01315California941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT MAURICIO PENATE, No. 1:24-cv-01315-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE

v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

AMR H. RAMADAN, RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

TO THIS ACTION

Defendant.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES (ECF No. 9) 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983.

18 Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on October 28, 2024. (ECF No. 1) Plaintiff 19 acknowledges on the face of his complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies. 20 (ECF. No. 1 at 3-4). Indeed, Plaintiff admits he has appealed “to highest but I’m awaiting 21 response and need immediate relief from the Court.” (Id.) Therefore, on October 31, 2024, the 22 Court ordered Plaintiff to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.