Bailey
Bailey v. Shasta Union High School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Maril Bailey, No. 2:23-cev-01750-KJM-DMC Plaintiff, ORDER v. Shasta Union High School District, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 As explained in this order, plaintiff Maril Bailey’s complaint largely satisfies the 18 requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) and thus withstands the pending Rule 12 motions to dismiss and strike for the most part. There are a few gaps in Bailey’s allegations, but 20 these could potentially be filled by the addition of factual allegations in an amended complaint, so the motions to dismiss and strike are granted in part with leave to amend. 22 I. BACKGROUND For purposes of this motion, the court assumes the following allegations are true. See 24 Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). Several years ago, when Maril Bailey was fifteen years old, she was a student at Foothill High School in Palo Cedro, California. …