Vargas

Vargas v. Capstone Logistics LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20242:24-cv-00712California2,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Antonia Vargas and Maria Barrera, No. 2:24-cev-00712-KJM-JDP Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Capstone Logistics, LLC, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Defendant Capstone Logistics, LLC moves to compel arbitration of most of the claims 18 brought by plaintiffs Antonia Vargas and Maria Barrera. As explained in this order, Capstone has shown Barrera agreed to arbitrate, but the parties have cited contradictory evidence about whether Vargas also agreed to arbitrate, so the court grants the motion in part and otherwise holds it in abeyance. 22 I. BACKGROUND Vargas and Barrerra claim Capstone violated California labor law. See generally Compl. 418, ECF No. 1-1. They allege Capstone did not allow them to take breaks, did not pay overtime wages, did not reimburse them for business expenses, did not take mandatory precautions against COVID-19, gave them inaccurate wage statements and delayed their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.