M.F.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 M.F., et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-1009-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On October 11, 2024, defendants Meschery and Sierra-Plumas Joint United School District filed motions to dismiss and strike portions of plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. ECF Nos. 28 & 29. To date, plaintiffs have not filed a response to either motion. Under the court’s local rules, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to a motion no later than fourteen days after the date it was filed. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir.…