Doerer

(PC) Benoite v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20241:24-cv-01407California574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SHELTON BENOITE, Case No. 1:24-cv-01407-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. (Doc. No. 2) J. DOERER, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT

Defendants. OF INMATE FILING FEE BY THE

BUREAU OF PRISONS

17 18 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, initiated this action on November 18, 2024, by filing a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics1 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis on his Complaint and submitted a certification from prison officials in support. (Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff has made the showing required by § 1915(a) to proceed in forma pauperis but remains obligated to pay the full $350.00 statutory filing fees as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Pursuant to § 1915(b)(1)(A), Plaintiff is obligated to make an initial payment of $29.331

1 The statute requires an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.