Burkhart

(PC) Price v. Burkhart

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20242:22-cv-02306California983 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IMMANUEL C. PRICE, No. 2:22-cv-2306 WBS CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

M. BURKHART, Defendant. 16 By order filed June 27, 2024, this Court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement and any motion for incarcerated witnesses on or before November 13, 2024. Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s order. (ECF No. 25.) Therefore, the Court recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and, in exercising that power, may impose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.