Booza
(PC) Carey v. Booza
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL D. CAREY, No. 2:24-cv-1717 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GREGORY BOOZA and CHRISTIAN
JUAREZ,
15 Defendants.
17 The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (ECF No. 12), motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 15) and motion for extension of time (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff is incarcerated and is bringing his civil case as a self-represented litigant proceeding in forma pauperis. On October 30, 2024, the undersigned rejected plaintiff’s operative first amended complaint pursuant to the screening process associated with in forma pauperis status, and gave plaintiff 30 days to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 13. I. Motion for Default Judgment Plaintiff requested that the Clerk of Court enter default against defendant Gregory Booza on August 28, 2024. ECF No. 10. The Clerk of Court denied entry of default, noting that service had not been ordered by the court. ECF No. 11. …