Terrana

AuguStar Life Assurance Corp. v. Terrana

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20242:24-cv-02096California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AUGUSTAR LIFE ASSURANCE No. 2:24-cv-02096-DC-AC

CORPORATION,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR v. PERMISSION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY 14 PHYLLIS TERRANA, et al., (Doc. Nos. 29, 31) 15 Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on the motions for permission to utilize electronic case filing (“ECF”) filed by pro se Defendants Sherry Kunkle and Phillip Terrana respectively on October 30, 2024 and October 31, 2024. (Doc. Nos. 29, 31.) Pursuant to Local Rule 133(b)(2), pro se parties must file and serve paper documents; pro se parties “may not utilize electronic filing except with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge” as provided by Local Rule 133(b)(3). A pro se litigant seeking permission to use ECF shall submit such a request as a stipulation “or, if a stipulation cannot be had, as written motions setting out an explanation of reasons for the exception.” L.R. 133(b)(3). Here, both pending motions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.