Singh

BMO Bank N.A. v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20241:24-cv-00740California1,163 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A., ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0740 JLT HBK ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART, GRANTING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT ) JUDGMENT IN PART, AND DIRECTING THE MAJOR SINGH, ) CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE ) Defendant. ) (Docs. 10, 15) ) )

BMO Harris Bank N.A. seeks to hold Major Singh liable for breach of contract. (See generally Doc. 1.) After Defendant failed to answer, the Court entered default against Defendant. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff now seeks default judgment against Defendant. (Doc. 10.) The magistrate judge found the Court has diversity jurisdiction over the claims presented and personal jurisdiction over Defendant. (Doc. 15 at 4-5.) The magistrate judge also determined Plaintiff complied with the service requirements under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Id. at 5-6.) Examining the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.