Zavala

Zavala v. Valdes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20241:24-cv-01360California343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO ZAVALA, Case No. 1:24-cv-01360-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (Doc. 5) ROBERT VALDES,

Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in this action. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009); Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349, 1353 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), but it will do so only if exceptional circumstances exist. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970; Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). In making this determination, the Court must evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of Plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970 (citation and quotation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.