Houston v. City of Fairfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIELLE N. HOUSTON, No. 2:22-CV-01045-JAM-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CITY OF FAIRFIELD, a public entity; City of Fairfield Police Officers JOSHUA SMITH (BADGE #1730), BRENDAN BASSI (BADGE #1716), DAVID REEVES (BADGE #927), GAIL HILL (BADGE #1201), individually, jointly and severally; 18 Defendants. 19 INTRODUCTION Before this Court are cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties filed four briefs in support of and in opposition to the cross motions including Plaintiff Danielle Houston’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for partial summary judgment, Plf.’s Partial Mot. for Summary Judgment, ECF no. 70; Defendants’ City of Fairfield (the “City”), Joshua Smith, David Reeves, Gail Hill, and Brendan Bassi (“Officers,” collectively with the City, “Defendants”) cross-motion for summary judgment, Def.’s Mot. for Summary…