(SS) (PS) Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20242:24-cv-03105California507 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY LOUISE WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:24-cv-03105-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO

PROCEED FORMA PAUPERIS

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF No. 2) 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Mary Louise Williams requests leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, in forma pauperis (“IFP”), under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 (ECF No. 2.) However, Plaintiff’s affidavit is incomplete and does not contain all the information needed for the Court to determine whether this motion should be granted. Specifically, in responding to question 2, Plaintiff states that she receives gross pay or wages of $1,182 and take- home pay or wages of $1,182 per month, but she has not included her employer’s name or address. In question 3, Plaintiff checked the box “yes” that she received income from rent payments, interest, or dividends income in the past 12 months. However, Plaintiff has not described the source of that income, the amount…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.