Anderson

Anderson v. Optum Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20241:24-cv-00535California2,213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICOLE ANDERSON, No. 1:24-cv-00535-KES-CDB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT OPTUM

SERVICES, INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL

OPTUM SERVICES, INC., ARBITRATION Defendant. (Doc. No. 10)

17 This matter is before the Court on the motion to compel arbitration filed by defendant Optum Services, Inc., (“Optum”) on September 25, 2024. (Doc. 10.) The pending motion was taken under submission on the papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) on October 22, 2024. (Doc. 14.) For the reasons explained below, defendant Optum’s motion to compel arbitration is granted. BACKGROUND On March 20, 2024, plaintiff Nicole Anderson initiated this action by filing a complaint against Optum and Does 1–50 in the Kern County Superior Court. (Doc. 1-2 at 5.) Optum was served with the summons and a copy of the complaint on April 4, 2024. (Id. at 2–5.) After filing an answer to Anderson’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.