(SS) Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20241:21-cv-00402California1,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 Bernard Ward, Case No. 1:21-cv-00402-GSA-JLT 5 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO v. GRANT MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 406(b)

8 Commissioner of Social Security, 9 Defendant.

Plaintiff’s counsel Jonathan O. Peña seeks an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Doc. 29. Counsel served Plaintiff by mail with a copy of the motion which notified Plaintiff of the right to respond, if at all, within 14 days of the motion. Doc. 29 at 1; Doc. 30. Plaintiff did not file a response. Defendant filed a response summarizing the applicable law but taking no position on the merits of the fee request. Doc. 30. I. Background Plaintiff entered into a contingent fee agreement with counsel which provides for attorney fees of up to 25% of the past due benefits awarded. Doc. 29-2. The agreement also provides that counsel would seek fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), fees which would be refunded in the event of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.