Campbell

(PC) Rogers v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20241:21-cv-00021California6,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES A. ROGERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00021-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

K. CAMPBELL, et al., (Doc. 29)

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Charles A. Rogers is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND The Court issued its Third Screening Order on January 26, 2024, finding Plaintiff’s third amended complaint plausibly alleged a First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Campbell, as well as violations of the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause against Defendants Cates and Sullivan. (Doc. 22.) On April 5, 2024, Defendants Campbell, Cates and Sullivan filed a motion to dismiss, alleging Plaintiff fails to state claims upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. 29.) Plaintiff filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.