Genseal

(PC) Lloyd v. Genseal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20241:24-cv-01117California1,396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN JUAN LLOYD, Case No.: 1:24-cv-01117-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR PLAINTIFF’S

v. FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER AND

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

M. GENSEAL, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

Plaintiff Adrian Juan Lloyd is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint on September 19, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On September 30, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) or to pay the filing fee within 45 days. (Doc. 3.) On October 10, 2024, Plaintiff submitted an IFP application. (Doc. 5.) On October 15, 2024, this Court issued its “Order to Show Cause in Writing Why Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Should Not Be Denied.” (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff was directed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.