Mohammad

(PC) Dixson v. Mohammad

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20242:24-cv-00332California369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETROIS T. DIXSON, 2:24-cv-00332 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND F. MOHAMMAD, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Demetrois Dixson, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The undersigned previously screened plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) and found the complaint states two cognizable claims against defendant F. Mohammad, but otherwise states no cognizable claims. (See ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff was directed to file a notice indicating how he wishes to proceed. Plaintiff has filed his notice and elects to stand on his complaint as filed and have a district judge assigned to the case to determine what claims are stated. (ECF No. 13.) In accordance with the above, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this case. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.