Beyersdorf

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beyersdorf

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20242:24-cv-02253California704 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE No. 2:24-cv-02253-DAD-JDP

COMMISSION,

12 Plaintiff/Petitioner, ORDER COMPELLING v. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT

JAMES L. BEYERSDORF, BE ENTERED AGAINST HIM PURSUANT

TO SECTION 21(e) OF THE SECURITIES Defendant/Respondent. EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 16 (Doc. No. 1)

18 This matter is before the court on the Application of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), filed on August 19, 2024, for an order compelling defendant/respondent James L. Beyersdorf to show cause why a judgment should not be entered against him pursuant to Section 21(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u(e)(1), to enforce compliance with the Order Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order Pursuant to Section 21C of the Exchange Act, Sections 203(e), 203(f),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.