Fisher

Garrett Case v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20241:19-cv-01739California754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARRETT CASE, ) Case No.: 1:19-CV-1739-KES-BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO v. ) COMPEL AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S ) MOTION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME RAYTHEL FISHER JR. et al., ) TO FILE OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT MOTION Defendants. ) ) (Docs. 78, 83) ) ) ) Plaintiff Garrett Case, proceeding pro se in this civil action, moved to compel the production of “Records from CDCR” on August 12, 2024. Doc. 78. In the motion, he requests “equal access to my electronic file/records/history of 602, 602-HC, 1842 ADA grievance forms and attachments.” Id. at 2. On September 23, 2024, plaintiff moved for an additional extension of time to file an opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Doc. 83. Discovery in this matter, including expert discovery, has been closed since October 20, 2021. See Doc. 36. Courts may…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.