Phui
(PC) Davis v. Phui
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY B. DAVIS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS
v. DEFENDANTS CHANZA, CRYER, AND
SHERMAN
DR. UGWUEZE, KHUONG PHUI, C. CRYER, JR., STUART SHERMAN, and Doc. 81 L. CHANZA, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Kelly B. Davis, proceeding in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff initiated this action on February 24, 2020, and he filed his second amended complaint on September 7, 2022. Docs. 1, 54. On February 9, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the district court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Chanza, Cryer, and Sherman because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative…