Phui

(PC) Davis v. Phui

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20241:20-cv-00276California582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY B. DAVIS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00276-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. DEFENDANTS CHANZA, CRYER, AND

SHERMAN

DR. UGWUEZE, KHUONG PHUI, C. CRYER, JR., STUART SHERMAN, and Doc. 81 L. CHANZA, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Kelly B. Davis, proceeding in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action against Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff initiated this action on February 24, 2020, and he filed his second amended complaint on September 7, 2022. Docs. 1, 54. On February 9, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the district court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants Chanza, Cryer, and Sherman because Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.