Wright

(PC) Graham v. Wright

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20241:22-cv-00504California1,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAPHAEL GRAHAM, No. 1:22-cv-00504-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. Doc. 48 WRIGHT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Raphael Graham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against defendant Wright for alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment by conducting a strip search of the plaintiff with an activated body camera, exposing plaintiff’s genitals on camera, and for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 15, 2024, defendant filed a notice of request to seal documents pursuant to Local Rule 141, together with a redacted motion for summary judgment arguing that defendant did not violate plaintiff’s First or Fourth Amendment rights and that defendant is entitled to qualified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.