Wright
(PC) Graham v. Wright
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAPHAEL GRAHAM, No. 1:22-cv-00504-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
v. Doc. 48 WRIGHT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Raphael Graham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against defendant Wright for alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment by conducting a strip search of the plaintiff with an activated body camera, exposing plaintiff’s genitals on camera, and for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 15, 2024, defendant filed a notice of request to seal documents pursuant to Local Rule 141, together with a redacted motion for summary judgment arguing that defendant did not violate plaintiff’s First or Fourth Amendment rights and that defendant is entitled to qualified…