(PC) Arellano v. CAL PIA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20241:23-cv-01202California765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY ARELLANO, No. 1:23-cv-01202-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF

CAL. PIA, et al. Doc. 12 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 18, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss this action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. Doc. 12. The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within fourteen days. Id. at 6. Plaintiff filed objections on January 2, 2024. Doc. 13. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.