Mongia

Mongia v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20241:23-cv-01234California7,633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ISAAC MONGIA, Case No. 1:23-cv-01234-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO:

v. (1) FILE A SECOND AMENDED CITY OF FRESNO, et al. COMPLAINT; OR

Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT PLAINTIFF

WANTS TO STAND ON THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 13)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Isaac Mongia proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 3, 13). Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on 20 May 17, 2024, which is now before the Court for screening.1 (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff’s First 21 Amended Complaint generally concerns his arrest for violation of a restraining order. 22 Upon review, the Court concludes that Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff now has options as to how to proceed in this matter. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint, if Plaintiff believes that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.