Dyer
Smith v. Dyer
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20241:24-cv-01288California2,484 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01288-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND
WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, FOR
DYER, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 8 OF
THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
Defendants. PROCEDURE AND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-
MATTER JURISDICTION
(ECF No. 1)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS 19 20 Plaintiff Candace Smith (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 21 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on October 22, 2024, 22 appears to seek to hold Defendant Jerry Dyer and Margaret Mims liable for, among other things, 23 attempted murder, stalking, invasion of privacy, and sexual assault. (ECF No. 1). 24 Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. Upon review, the Court finds 25 that Plaintiff’s complaint…