Samran

Samran v. Manulife Investment Mgt. Farmland Mgt. Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 26, 20242:24-cv-01042California3,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INDERJIT SAMRAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-01042-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTIONS TO COMPEL

MANULIFE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT FARMLAND (ECF Nos. 12,16) MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Defendant. 17 Defendant Manulife Investment Management Farmland Management Services, Inc. moves to compel Plaintiff Inderjit Samran to make his initial disclosures and to respond to Defendant’s interrogatories and requests for production.1 Def. Mot. Compel Init. Discl. (ECF No. 12); Def. Mot. Compel Written Disco. (ECF No. 16). Defendant also seeks the award of sanctions for having to file the motions to compel. Def. Mot. Compel Init. Discl. at 4; Def. Mot. Compel Written Disco. at 6. Pursuant to Local Rule 251(e), Defendant’s motions are excepted from the requirement for Joint Statements re Discovery Disagreement and were set for hearing on November 26, 2024. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 251(e); Def. Mot. Compel Init. Discl. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.