Maldonado

Maldonado v. Boudreaux

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20241:22-cv-01518California10,329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVIER ANGEL MALDONADO, Case No. 1:22-cv-01518-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1

v.

(Doc. No. 26)

MICHAEL BOUDREAUX, et al., Defendants. 17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment filed May 28, 2024. (Doc. No. 26, “Motion”). Plaintiff timely filed an Opposition, (Doc. No. 27), and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. No. 29). On September 17, 2024, the Court heard oral argument on the Motion. (Doc. No. 38). Finding no genuine dispute of material fact, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History On November 23, 2022, Plaintiff Javier Angel Maldonado, represented by counsel, filed this federal and state civil rights action against Defendants County of Tulare, California (“The 27 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.