Chick-Fil-A

Smith v. Chick-Fil-A

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20241:24-cv-00814California699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No.: 1:24-cv-0814 JLT BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, AND

CHICK-FIL-A, et al., DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

CLOSE THIS CASE

Defendants. (Doc. 11) 16 Candace Smith seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of her civil rights, racketeering, and violations of state law. (See generally Doc. 1.) The assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim under federal law. (Doc. 4 at 3-4.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint or notify the Court if she wished to dismiss the action. (Id. at 5.) After Plaintiff did not respond to the Court’s order, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations, reiterating the findings in the Screening Order and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.