Mohmand

(PC) Newsome v. Mohmand

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20242:23-cv-00151California578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELDON RAY NEWSOME, No. 2:23-cv-0151 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. MOHMAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both parties have consented to have all matters in this action before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On July 16, 2024, defendant Mohmand (defendant) filed a motion to compel plaintiff to provide responses to certain requests for discovery. On August 20, 2024, because plaintiff had not responded to the motion, plaintiff was ordered to file a response. The court extended the deadline to file a response to November 8, 2024, following plaintiff’s October 2, 2024, request for more time. Despite plaintiff being specifically warned that failure to file a response to the motion to compel could result in dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), plaintiff has not filed a response. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.