Ayub

(PS) Mokaram v. Ayub

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20242:24-cv-03009California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAYED MOKARAM, No. 2:24-cv-3009 DC AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SAYED AYUB, Defendant. 15 16 On November 11, 2024, plaintiff filed this action in pro se and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. The case was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). The undersigned reviewed the complaint and, believing that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s case, issued an Order to Show Cause directed to plaintiff requiring that he respond and demonstrate that federal jurisdiction exists. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff did not file a response. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any basis for this court’s jurisdiction, and the undersigned finds none. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction for the reasons set forth at ECF No. 4, and that this case be closed. These findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.