Morales Sandoval v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 202423-1163California806 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGE ALBERTO MORALES No. 23-1163 SANDOVAL, Agency No.

A206-876-656

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 22, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jorge Alberto Morales Sandoval, a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order

dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(CAT).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.