Lapoyeu Juarez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 202423-2238California667 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SILVIA AMARILIS LAPOYEU No. 23-2238 JUAREZ; MILAN NOEL LOPEZ Agency Nos.

LAPOYEU, A215-879-830

A215-879-831

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 22, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Silvia Amarilis Lapoyeu Juarez and her son, natives and citizens of Guatemala,

petition for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing their appeal of the denial of their application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.