Cluse
Cluse v. Rowden
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 202424-2045California2,418 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 29 2024
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
DANIEL WILLIAM CLUSE, No. 24-2045 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cv-08169-SMB-DMF v. MEMORANDUM*
TRAVIS JAMES ROWDEN, in his individual and official capacities,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
COUNTY OF COCONINO, JIM
DRISCOLL, Sheriff,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 19, 2024 San Jose, California
Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BUMATAY.
Plaintiff Daniel William Cluse brought this excessive-force action, pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Coconino County and officers from the County
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Sheriff’s Department, including, as relevant here, Deputy Sheriff Travis James