Modelos y Dise�os Omega S v. Architectural Materials USA CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 2, 2024D083369California4,068 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/27/24 Modelos y Diseños Omega S v. Architectural Materials USA CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MODELOS Y DISEÑOS OMEGA S, D083369

DE R.L.,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022- v. 00014140-CU-BC-CTL)

ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS USA,

INC. et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kenneth J. Medel, Judge. Affirmed.

Gupta Evans & Ayres, Ajay Gupta, and Aurora Gallardo for Defendants and Appellants. Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek and Ricardo Arias for Plaintiff and Respondent. Modelos y Diseños Omega S, de R.L. (MDO) filed a complaint against Architectural Materials USA, Inc. (AMI), Gregory Romine, and Victor Maple…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.