Landazuri-Encinas

United States v. Landazuri-Encinas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 202424-3298California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3298 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:17-cr-00691-JGZ-AMM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

LUIS ONORIO LANDAZURI-

ENCINAS, AKA Luis Honorio Landazuri- Encinas, AKA Luis Encinas-Lanzurei,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2024**

Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Luis Onorio Landazuri-Encinas appeals from the district court’s judgment

revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month sentence. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Landazuri-Encinas’s counsel has filed a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.