Taylor
United States v. Taylor
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 2 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2838 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:16-cr-01377-ROS-2 v.
MEMORANDUM*
THINTINUS NOSETH TAYLOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 20, 2024**
Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Thintinus Noseth Taylor appeals from the district court’s order revoking
supervised release and imposing a sentence of imprisonment of 6 months and
days, to be followed by 24 months’ supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Taylor’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to…