Taylor

United States v. Taylor

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 202424-2838California236 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 2 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2838 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:16-cr-01377-ROS-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

THINTINUS NOSETH TAYLOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2024**

Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Thintinus Noseth Taylor appeals from the district court’s order revoking

supervised release and imposing a sentence of imprisonment of 6 months and

days, to be followed by 24 months’ supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Taylor’s counsel has filed a brief stating that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.