Jayashankar
Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMERA LABS INC., Case No. 21-cv-2137-MMA-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE COUNSEL’S MOTION
TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF
RAJ JAYASHANKAR, et al.,
RECORD FOR KIMERA LABS INC
Defendants. [Doc. No. 361] 16 17 18 19 On November 30, 2024, Plaintiff Kimera Labs Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) attorneys Peter T. Mavrick, Esq., Jacob M. Resnick, Esq., Karen Lowell, Esq., and the Mavrick Law Firm (collectively, the “Mavrick Law Firm Attorneys”) filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff. Doc No. 361. “An attorney may not withdraw as counsel except by leave of court.” Darby v. City of Torrance, 810 F. Supp. 275, 276 (C.D. Cal. 1992); see also CivLR 83.3(f)(3). The decision to grant or deny a motion for withdrawal is within the court’s discretion, and courts consider the following factors: “(1) the reasons why withdrawal is sought; (2) the prejudice withdrawal may cause to other…