Christopher Bunker v. Joseph Buccinio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRISTOPHER BUNKER, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-09263-FLA (DFMx) Plaintiffs,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JOSEPH BUCCINIO, et al.,

JUDGE

Defendants. [DKT. 123] 15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Dkt. 123 (“R&R”). Furthermore, the court has conducted a de novo review of the objections that were filed. Dkts. 124 (“Hannah’s Obj.’s”), 125 (“Pls.’ Obj.’s”). The Report recommends granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs Christopher Bunker, Teresa Bunker, Adam Bunker, and Casey Bunker’s (“Plaintiffs”) motion for leave to file a third amended complaint (“Motion”). See R&R; Dkt. 104. The objections to the Report do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendation. …