Ralon
Ralon v. Kaiser Permanente Hospital
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOMITILA PELAEZ RALON,
Case No. 23-cv-03344-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, COMPLAINT
INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendants.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (“Motion”) and Defendants have filed a response. The Motion is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED.1 II. BACKGROUND On February 26, 2024, Plaintiff filed the second amended complaint (“SAC”), which is the operative complaint in the case. In it, she sues Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (“Kaiser”) under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d. She asserts that Kaiser discriminated against her on the basis or race and national origin when Kaiser doctor Rana…